Thursday, February 5, 2026

My Early Story (34)

I've been wanting to circle back on My Early Story and touch on the Charismatic Movement. A friend of mine made a comment to me a couple of weeks ago that motivated me to do it. 


The Charismatic Movement


I imagine I should say some things about the Charismatic Movement, since it also played a formative role in my early life (the 1960s and early 1970s). I realize that not everyone has good memories of the movement, and I see some crazies today who are products of it. However, I also meet folks for whom it was a formative blessing, many of them now in vocational ministry in traditional settings.

 

Frankly, when I consider the disgusting unconscionable behavior, including coverups, that have occurred in churches, Protestant, Pentecostal, Anglican, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox, the excesses of the Charismatic Movement pale in comparison. The problem with Pentecostals and Charismatics used to be that they didn’t know how to properly deport themselves, they weren’t “religious” enough, that was really, I think, their great sin (that and being a threat to old wineskins). Furthermore, whatever sins and stupidness were present in the Charismatic Movement generally weren’t institutional (as with traditional churches) – for it had no institutions in the beginning.

 

There isn’t anything today that I’d term a Charismatic Movement, but there is a lot of craziness going on – everywhere, in non-traditional settings and in traditional settings. I don’t know really what to think, so much poison in thinking and behavior. Well, I do know what to think, we need Jesus, O how we need Jesus.

 

While I am going to focus on the positive, I want to mention that I had a terrible time at one point when associated with the “Movement.” I can’t look back on it without shame, disgust, and sorrow. I want you to know that I write from a critical point-of-view, but that I’m also thankful for the Spirit of renewal that not only touched many during that time, but which laid the foundation for many of my future relationships.

 

When we go astray it is usually because Jesus is no longer enough, we think we need something to add to Him (2 Cor. 11:1 – 3; Mt. 17:5).

 

My initial exposure to the movement took two forms, one was through the Full Gospel Business Men’s Fellowship International, the other through a local Assembly of God.

 

After my abbreviated time at Bible college, I sought fellowship in a local church back in Maryland. Considering my experience at Bible college, and considering that my two pastors who were instrumental in sending me to the school did not follow up with me after my expulsion, it was natural that I’d look elsewhere for a place to worship and meet people. Perhaps the pastors were embarrassed that someone they had endorsed was expelled, perhaps they just didn’t know how to relate to a kid who had not been raised in their tradition, perhaps it was simpler for them to leave me alone – teenagers can require investment, time, work, and patience.

 

I began attending a small Assembly of God within walking distance of where I lived. The building would probably only hold 100 – 150 people and there was no threat of overcrowding. The pastor was a retired FBI agent who exhibited a thoughtful and quiet demeanor. There was a group within the congregation that gathered on Sunday mornings, they were charismatic refugees from the Methodist Church; the refugee Methodists befriended me.  

 

The “refugees” greatly respected the pastor, and I think were bemused at his dilemma, for while he was a traditional AG pastor, they were not traditional Pentecostal parishioners. Yet, in looking back, the pastor was likely ideal for them in that he had a breath of experience outside his religious tradition, and he could give them room to grow in Christ; he was able to minister to folks outside his tradition as well as those within it – a rare combination.

 

Of the three major “white” Pentecostal denominations, I have long thought that the Assemblies of God were more open to those from other traditions…and to those from no tradition. I think this ability to welcome and assimilate, to be permeable in culture, has contributed to the growth of the AG. While I have encountered AG throwbacks that focus on externals and legalism and a message of condemnation, these have been the exception in my experience. The same is true for having an emphasis on the Baptism in the Holy Spirit with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues, this is not “the thing” today that it once was in the AG, and I wonder why my Pentecostal brethren don’t rethink this “distinctive.”

 

Let me return to the “refugees” lest I dwell too much on Pentecostals.

 

The refugees met in homes regularly as a way of life. We’d read the Bible, pray, and listen to teaching tapes by various charismatic teachers. There were times when we’d drive to the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C. and pray in one of the chapels – in those days at least one chapel was accessible 24 hours a day.  

 

I don’t recall an insistence that people speak in tongues, or any notion that people who moved in the gifts of the Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:4 – 13) were better than anyone else. I don’t remember any hint of exclusiveness. I do recall that it was assumed that everyone was valuable, that everyone had something to share. I cherish my memories of the refugees being excited about Jesus, about God being alive in our lives on a daily basis.

 

Christ Church was an Assembly of God in N.W. D.C. It had a large seating capacity, and it opened its doors during certain evenings for folks across the city to come and worship in an open and “charismatic” fashion. I don’t recall whether this was weekly, but it was regularly scheduled. I think it was called “T.A.G,” which meant “take and give.” That was the spirit of the Charismatic Movement as I knew it in those days, you gathered with other disciples of Jesus to share and receive, the notion that only one person did all the talking was foreign, the notion that we were expected to do the same thing the same way week after week was alien. We were growing together, learning together, worshipping together.


To be continued...

 

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

As My Soul Draws Nigh

 

As My Soul Draws Nigh

RLW Feb. 3, 2026

1:00 PM

 

As my soul draws nigh

Beyond the eastern sky

I will ascend, I will ascend

To that City

 

To home I will draw

To my Father’s House

From whence I came, whence I came

In Christ Jesus my Lord

 

To Melchizedek, and Zadok,

To the saints of the ages I come.

Coming home, O coming home

To My Father, to my Home

 

O my soul, draw thou nigh

To thy home, to thy Rock, to thy Lord,

On the wings of the Spirit, on the wings of the Spirit,

I ascend, I ascend

 

And the Light of the City

Overcomes my vision, engulfs my senses

Bathes me, bathes me, in His purity

I am cleansed, I am cleansed – HALLELUJAH I AM CLEANSED!!!!!!

 

And the Water of that City

Fills my soul, fills my soul

And it pours from me, yes it pours from me,

And I swim, O how I swim, Hallelujah how I swim!

 

And my soul draws nigh to the Temple of that City

And my soul it comes home to that Temple.

To the Father and the Lamb, to the Great, Great I AM

I am HOME, I am HOME, I AM HOME!!!!

 

And my soul has entered into the Temple of that City

And I rest, how I rest in the Lamb

I lay down in green pastures, I walk beside still waters,

And my soul, O my soul, is in PEACE.

 

 

 

Monday, February 2, 2026

Confrontation in Nazareth (12)

“And all were speaking well of Him, and wondering at the gracious words which were falling from His lips; and they were saying, ‘Is this not Joseph’s son?’” (Luke 4:22).

 

Some thoughtful folks see genuine wonder and praise in Luke 4:22, other thoughtful people see “who does He think He is, we know Him and His family?”  As we saw in our previous reflection, the congregation, His hometown church, soon tried to murder Jesus.

 

In John 8:30 – 59 there is a similar pattern. We go from “many believing in Him” (Jn. 8:30) to these same people “picking up stones to throw at Him” (8:59).

 

How does Jesus respond to “many believing in Him”?

 

“If you continue in My word then you are truly My disciples; and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (Jn. 8:31 – 32).

 

Just as in Nazareth, Jesus could have left well enough alone. In Nazareth Jesus could have found a different passage to read in Isaiah, but He didn’t. In Nazareth He could have not introduced the stories of the widow of Zarephath and Naaman the Syrian, but He did. In Nazareth He could have eased into the idea that He was the Messiah, He could have given His hometown folks time to get used to the idea, time to adjust, time to consider, time to ponder, but He didn’t.

 

In John 8, in Jerusalem, He could have eased the people who were “believing in Him” into the idea that there was a freedom they were not yet experiencing.  He need not have brought up slavery to sin (Jn. 8:34 – 36). Why does He say that “You seek to kill Me, because My word has no place in you”? (Jn. 8:37). After all, outwardly they were believing in Him, why not leave things alone, why penetrate their hearts? Why not give these people time?

 

Why keep insisting that they can’t hear His word (Jn. 8:43)?

 

And why, O why, tell the people, “You are of your father the devil”? (Jn. 8:44).

 

This makes no sense, doesn’t Jesus want to build a nice large church? Doesn’t He want to get His message across? Why does He alienate people?

 

The people go from believing in Him (verse 30) to accusing Him of having a demon (verse 48) to attempting to kill Him (verse 59). Things move quickly toward attempted murder in John 8 just as they do in Luke 4. Why, in both instances, does Jesus say things that will incite the people to reject Him and attempt to kill Him? Why can’t He be a seeker-sensitive Messiah? Why won’t God Incarnate cater to our needs and wants and desires and agendas? Why won’t Jesus play church?

 

“For judgment I came into this world, so that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind” (Jn. 9:39). The simplicity of the story of Jesus and the blind man ought to instruct us. Just as Jesus was put out of the synagogue in Luke 4, so the blind man who was healed by Jesus was cast out of the synagogue in John 9. Even the blind man’s parents disowned him “because they were afraid of the Jews [the religious leaders]” (Jn. 9:22).

 

Jesus strips away our pretentions, our religious facades, our Sunday-morning personas, and He gets to the heart of the matter – we are blind; our heritage – whether religious or national or ethnic or family – does not make us God’s chosen people – we have no possibility of righteousness outside of Jesus Christ and He will make certain that we know this. We will either know this and accept this, or we will refuse to acknowledge Him and attempt to murder Him.

 

I imagine the attempted murder of Jesus Christ occurs every Sunday morning in “Christian” gatherings across the globe. The idea that He may be working in the widows of Zarephath or in the Naamans of Syria is too much for us, the thought that Jesus may want to burst our wineskins and replace them with Himself as our Temple, and that He wants to bring those who are not like us into our lives, is too much for us. We will kill those ideas, we will bury those teachings, we will replace any pastors who dare suggest such things.

 

We must seal ourselves off from the Samaritans in our communities and nation and world. We must isolate ourselves in order to protect our way of life, our “lifestyles,” our religious self-righteousness. Just as the people of Jerusalem, we say to Jesus, “We are the children of America and have never been slaves to anyone!” Unless of course, we are African – American.

 

We say to Jesus, “We are Pentecostal, we are Reformed, we are Lutheran, we are Roman Catholic, we are Anglican, we are Arminian, we are nondenominational, we are Conservative, we are Liberal.” Well, you get the idea. Don’t mess with our security, with our identity, with our righteousness.  Do not question our way of doing church, of church growth, of the End Times; and most certainly don’t take issue with our view of what it means to be prolife (as Pope Leo has done).

 

We see much the same scenario in John 6 as we do in Luke 4 and John 8. Jesus goes from a crowd to a few.

 

“Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled” (Jn. 6:26).

 

“Therefore the Jews were grumbling about Him, because He said, ‘I am the bread that came down out of heaven.’ They were saying, ‘Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How does He now say, I have come down out of heaven?’” (John6:41 – 42). What does this passage remind you of?

 

When Jesus says, “For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father,” many of His disciples leave Him “and were not walking with Him anymore” (John 6:65 – 66).

 

Now here is the thing dear reader, and here you can know where you really are in your relationship with Jesus Christ. It all comes down to your answer to Jesus to this question of His.

 

“So Jesus said to the twelve, ‘You do not want to go away also, do you?’” (John 6:67).

 

What is my response to Jesus?

 

What is yours?