The speaker styled himself a Futurist. He explained that futurists think about the future. I was
naturally relieved when he clarified that question. Was anyone in his
audience was wondering about it? Could it really be that someone thought that a
futurist pondered the past, or the
present? Oh well, let me move on.
For about an hour he presented
us with graphs and statistics demonstrating that the world is changing and
changing quickly. Then he was finished. That was it. I wonder how much he was
paid for showing graphs and statistics? Most people applauded. I would like to
think that they applauded because he was finished. I would not like to think
that they applauded because they considered his presentation worth an hour of
our collective time.
Let’s see; there were about
100 of us, that’s 100 hours – simple math. Was it worth 100 hours?
People are easily impressed.
What does that say about our critical thinking?
Here’s the thing, the futurist apparently envisioned a future
without people because he did not address how change affects people. He didn’t
talk about stress, he didn’t talk about relationships, he didn’t talk about the
quality of life, he didn’t talk about morals and ethics – he simply showed
graphs and charts and statistics. I don’t know which was worse, the quality of
the presentation or the fact that he was paid for the presentation.
I didn’t clap, I didn’t
applaud, I didn’t whistle. Had there been a Q & A I was prepared to ask the
first question, “What about people? How does all this affect people?” Alas,
there was no Q & A in our futurist’s future nor that of his audience.
But then I wondered about the
people who applauded – what were they thinking? Were they thinking? I don’t
mean to be harsh, but I see this all the time – people accepting what they’re
told without thinking about it. It’s like living in Flint, MI and trusting what
you’re told about the drinking water.
We are the servants of
technology, let us bow and worship lest we be thrown into the fiery furnace.
No comments:
Post a Comment