I’ve been pondering the story of
the Good Samaritan in Luke 10:30 – 37; certainly one of the great short stories
of all time, right along with the Prodigal Son. Jesus can tell a story and make
a point without wasting one word.
The Samaritan got his hands bloody
as he nursed the man left for half-dead. We’re told that the Samaritan “took
care of him”, we can see him tenderly tending to the stripped and beaten man. Neither
the priest or the scribe would get their hands bloody, neither the priest or
the scribe would interrupt their day to help. Neither the priest or the scribe
would be identified with the bloody and naked pulp lying on the road.
I wonder if the man who was
robbed ever came to his senses enough to see the Samaritan? Assuming the victim
was a Jew, and I sense that he was, did he realize that it was a Samaritan who
was saving his life?
Did the innkeeper know the
Samaritan? Perhaps he did, or else why would he take the Samaritan’s word that “whatever
more you spend, when I return I will repay you.”
Did the man who was near death
inquire of the innkeeper who it was that saved his life and who was paying for
his care? What was his reaction when he was told that the man was a Samaritan?
Jesus told this story in response
to a lawyer asking him, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” Had
the lawyer passed by people in need without stopping to help? Have I? Have you?
What about the man who was robbed
and beaten? Had he passed by people in need prior to his own tragedy? Had he
played the roll of the priest and the scribe?
More importantly, what was he
like after he walked out of the inn, once again a healthy man? Did he give
credit to the Samaritan when he told his story…to his family…to his friends…in
the synagogue? What about this guy? What was he like afterwards? How did he
look at Samaritans? How did he view those in need – of whatever background?
What about that guy? What about
me?
What about you?
No comments:
Post a Comment