The second
conversation that shocked me occurred less than two months ago, it is the most
recent of the three. Vickie and I were sitting at our table with a dear family
member. While we don’t see him often, for he lives on the other side of the
country, nor talk to him with great frequency, we love him and his family
deeply.
We were talking
about reading and understanding the Bible when he said to me, “I’m not an
intellectual like you, so it is hard for me to understand the Bible.”
My first thought
was, “O my, what have I done?” I was completely taken aback.
I rose from the
table, got a Bible from a bookshelf, placed it in front of him and sat down.
Then I said, “Please open it and let’s read it. Open it anywhere.”
He opened the
Bible at Daniel Chapter 10.
Now of all the
passages in the Bible, Daniel Chapter 10 was not toward the top of my list to
read with him because of its apocalyptic language and imagery, but as
Reepicheep counsels, we must take the adventure that Aslan gives us. And so our
nephew began reading aloud, and as he read a thought or two he’d stop and
reflect on it with Vickie and me. It was a sweet time and before we knew it
Neil had taken us through Daniel Chapter 10.
Neil saw the
essence of the chapter. He didn’t need a commentary, he didn’t need Vickie or
me to explain it, he did (I hope) benefit from our encouragement. While we made
occasional comments about possibilities of meaning, it was more along the line
of a hitting coach suggesting to a batter what pitches to look for with a
particular pitcher. A hitting coach cannot face the pitcher, only the player at
bat can do that.
After Neil had
taken us through Daniel Chapter 10, we turned to Matthew and looked at a few
passages. Since he was reading Matthew at home this seemed like a good idea –
once again, to use another baseball analogy, he was making contact and putting
the ball in play.
I don’t know
what our nephew’s concept of “intellectual” is, perhaps it is more along the
line of someone who receives formal education in a particular field, I suppose
I should ask him. I do hope that in our time together that he saw that the
Bible, by God’s grace, is accessible to us all – that as we come to God’s Word
that God’s Word comes to us.
When I
facilitate a small group, and when I preach, I tend to ask questions rather
than give answers. This was also true in my business career, since I wanted my
employees to grow, I needed to ask and seldom answer. Some folks respond well
to this approach, others hate it. I think that once most people get over their
insecurities that they not only begin to grow, but they learn to practice it
with others and thereby help them grow.
I have learned much
from the insights of others, insights which they would not have expressed had I
been doing most of the talking. Often in a small group someone will say
something that I had never thought of or seen in quite the same way – those
times are exciting to me. Furthermore, whether in the Kingdom or in business,
I’ve learned that if you give a group of people a problem and then leave them alone,
they will usually come up with some great solutions and possibilities.
In the first
conversation with our husband-and-wife friends, I was challenged by the
erroneous idea that you need to exegete the Bible in a certain methodical way
in order to understand it. In the second conversation I was challenged by the
idea, also false, that you have to be “intellectual” to readily understand
Scripture. In the first conversation I was asking myself, “Have I given that
impression in my teaching and preaching?” In the second conversation I was
asking myself, “How have I given that impression?”
The Scriptures are
clear that only the Holy Spirit can reveal God’s Word to us (John 16:12 – 15; 1
Corinthians 1:17 – 2:16). Pastors and teachers fall short if they do not
instill this in their people. All of our learning and education must go through
the Cross of Christ for it to be of lasting benefit. Perhaps all seminary and
Bible college students should memorize 1 Corinthians Chapter 2 before they
begin their studies. Perhaps all teachers and professors should be required to take
an annual refresher seminar on 1 Corinthians 1:17 – 2:16.
Perhaps Jesus’
words in John and Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians should be written above the
entrance to every seminary and every seminary library. Perhaps every author who
seeks to write a commentary ought to read these two passages every day prior to
beginning his work.
It is the rare
commentary that is unambiguous in its dependence on the Holy Spirit for
conveying the Word of God. These are the commentaries that view history,
archeology, textual spade work and transmission through Scripture and Christ, allowing
the Holy Spirit to bring the “natural” alive, rather than building a foundation
on the “natural” and forcing the Bible into the image of natural man. Many commentaries
are a mixture and can be confusing to the unaware and wearisome to others (wearisome
because the reader must constantly pick bones out of the fish). Some of us have
learned to eat fish with bones faster than others; all of us should be careful
when we do so.
The Holy Spirit
either breathed the Bible or not. The Holy Spirit is either the Primary Source
of the Bible or not. Yes, for sure God incorporates contemporary images, using
them “as-is” or transforming them upward into higher and deeper perspectives –
but the Primary Mover must always be the Holy Spirit, not the human author’s contemporary
surroundings, understandings, beliefs, practices, intentions, and cultural biases.
We must submit all things to Christ and seek Christ in all things. The Bible,
by God’s grace, transports us into the eternals in Christ Jesus. We are not to
live as earth dwellers.
We live in a time of exceptional information, I do not say that it is a time of exceptional knowledge, for to really know something requires, I think, a marriage of the mind and heart with the object to be known – whether in the concrete or the abstract (and the abstract is no longer the abstract to those who know it). Using this measure, we can seldom know anything by using a search engine.
Employing a
search engine and thinking the results by themselves give us knowledge is like
purchasing a tomato at a grocery store and thinking that we have grown the
tomato. We may gain data from the internet, but we are not likely to gain
knowledge or wisdom. We may come home from the grocery store with a tomato, but
that is not the same as our neighbor’s tomatoes on his table, for he has nurtured
the soil, planted the seeds, cared for the plants, and harvested the tomatoes.
Hothouse tomatoes seldom have taste, hothouse data from the internet is the
same.
Interpretive
methodologies may have their place, they may be helpful, but they must not sit
on the interpretive (hermeneutical and exegetical) throne – Jesus has reserved
that for the Holy Spirit. The wise interpreter submits himself and his approach
to the Christ of the Cross and the Cross of Christ, knowing that “knowledge
puffs up, but love edifies,” knowing that “the letter kills, but the Spirit
gives life.”
If we remove
the Holy Spirit, if we remove the supernatural, if understanding the Bible is
open to anyone who can learn hermeneutical and exegetical principles, if 100%
of the process of Biblical interpretation can be taught and tested – then what
the Bible says about itself is a lie, 1 Corinthians 1:17 – 2:16 is a lie, because
it teaches us that “a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of
God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they
are spiritually understood” (1 Cor. 2:14).
Our “faith is
not to rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God” (1 Cor. 2:5).
We, who are in
Christ, have been given the Holy Spirit “who is from God, so that we may know
the things freely given to us by God, which things we also speak, not in
words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining
spiritual thoughts with spiritual words” (1 Cor. 2:12 – 13).
Now, how we
negotiate all this is another matter, and whether we can recover from where we
are and return to where we ought to be in the Holy Spirit and the Living Word
is another matter. How these things are worked out is beyond my vision – I suppose
it must be local, always local – yet it may indeed have broader currents.
Christ Jesus must always be our North Star; the Cross must always be our portal
into the Divine and heavenly.
Someone has said
that while over the past few decades we may have done a good job of teaching
people the Bible (which I question), we have not done a good job at teaching people
to know Jesus.
There is an
irony here, when thinking about the Biblical text and interpretation. The irony
is that when we remove the Holy Spirit and supplant Him with our methodologies,
that our focus on the text is pretty much the same as those who teach the Bible
solely as literature; neither approach requires the Living Christ, neither requires
the supernatural, neither requires the Holy Spirit, both are controlled by “man.”
As John the
Baptist said, “A man can receive nothing unless it has been given him from heaven”
(John 3:27).
You may have
discerned another possible irony, and that is that I may appear to have drifted
into the “intellectual” after beginning this reflection insisting that being “intellectual”
is not necessary for seeing and understanding the Bible. If thinking about
things is being intellectual then I am guilty, but I don’t think so, I think I
am simply seeing Scripture as it is written, that I refuse to gloss over
passages such as 1 Corinthians 1:17 – 2:16.
If I am using
terms and concepts and sharing concerns that are unfamiliar to a reader, I am complementing
the reader on his or her ability to think about these important ideas and
teachings from the Bible. We do not grow by being constantly fed baby food
(Hebrews 5:11 – 6:3; 1 Cor. 3:1 – 2). Much of our small group and Sunday school
material might as well be published by the Gerber baby food company.
I refuse to treat
people as if they are stupid. I refuse to water down the Gospel and the Bible.
I refuse to deviate from calling us to total devotion and commitment to Jesus
Christ. I refuse to treat adults as children.
“For I
determined to know nothing about you, except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified”
(1 Cor. 2:2). Only the crucified Jesus Christ opens the door to seeing and
understanding Scripture.
Let us trust the
Holy Spirit to reveal Jesus and His Word to us (John 16:12 – 15).
Postscript: I realize that this can be challenging to those of us trained in hermeneutical and exegetical methods (methods of interpretation and communication). It is difficult for me to work through it, and I imagine I’ll die without having fully done so. Aren’t we always striving to see Jesus more clearly? To see His Word more fully?
Some of my teachers have held “methods” loosely and graciously,
giving room for their students to explore and grow as the Holy Spirit works and
lives in them, others have been more rigid. All have loved Jesus; all have done
their best. This is analogous to being trained to preach by a good teacher. I
love Scott Gibson and Haddon Robinson – for who they are in Christ (Haddon is
now in the Presence), for the content of their teaching, and for their own
preaching.
As I have previously shared, I was trained so well by Scott and Haddon that I didn’t need the Holy Spirit. After I’d been pastoring for a few months and preaching every Sunday, I realized that I had so absorbed and bought into Haddon’s methodology, including his exegetical approach (which I incorporated with that of the broader faculty) that I could preach without reliance on the Holy Spirit and that few, if anyone, would notice.
This frightened me and (I hope) drove me to a dependance
on Christ (I hope in some measure, I’m still learning this Way) and helped me
to hold all methods loosely. I may return to this subject at some point, we’ll
see. When you live in a culture or system, it can be difficult to critique it –
especially when it appeals to you.
No comments:
Post a Comment